WHO kickbacks from vaccine companies exposed

Is there any doubt that the World HELLth Organization is the most crooked, most corrupt, most sinister, and far and away staffed with the most hypocritical liars on the planet...

ABC News: "World Health Organization Scientists Linked to Swine Flu Vaccine Makers"

Natural News:  WHO scandal exposed advisors received kickbacks from H1N1 vaccine manufacturers

Washington Post:  Reports accuse WHO of exaggerating H1N1 threat, possible ties to drug makers

The response from WHO to the new report (published in the British Medical Journal) exposing their sinister concoction of the false H1N1 "pandemic", was to hypocritically defend their intentionally hiding their receipt of kickbacks from the vaccine makers in order to "protect the integrity and independence of the members while doing this critical work...to ensure transparency".

Footnote:  as of June 2010 WHO still had the certifiably ludicrous audacity to announce that the so-called H1N1 falsely termed "pandemic" [sic] had not yet passed it's peak.  That says it all, doesn't it.  WHO credibility has plunged from ZERO into negative territory... If you think we are making this up, here is a link to an article on WHO's latest laughable lunacy...

PC down, temporarily "off the air" until we can get it replaced...

Our PC went south, so until we can get it replaced and everything back in place, we will only be posting new information infrequently, when we can occasionally manage to borrow a PC...

Proof that the FDA, et ál, has no interest in your well being and is corrupt

A scientist working for the FDA expressed his scientific opinion to the top director that the radiation exposure from medical scanning was dangerous, an inference that the FDA should more tightly regulate and negate the danger. The director responded by eliminating that scientist's position with the FDA, which in plain terminology works out to be, "you're fired". The scientist has now turned whistleblower and articles are popping up regarding this type of travesty being "business as usual" with the FDA and other corp/gov agencies.

The articles also state that eight other FDA staffers "were pressured to change their scientific opinion" (about the dangers of the radiation) by managers of the FDA. That is called "suppression", to use a nice word. We can only conclude that the other eight fell into collusion with the criminal FDA management to keep their lucrative jobs...

This is the way it works. Whenever you read or hear anything coming out of ANY corp/gov agency, be skeptical and do not accept it as accurate. You know, tripe like "vaccines are safe and effective".

There is a link below to the article, which might be informative, covering other points such as "three California hospitals reported hundreds of acute radiation overdoses last year". Note that those reported "overdoses" were only those overdoses that were detectable that resulted in immediate obvious "adverse events", but of course does not encompass the overdoses that were barely under the line which will in time also produce their own adverse events in the form of blood diseases and cancers. No doubt these overdoses also "fry" up and ignite the toxic effluvients deposited and accumulated in the organs of the bodies of those that were gullible enough to get loaded up with the toxic poisons in vaccines, expediting those carcinogens and toxins in their process of inducing profitable diseases and cancers for the mainstream sick care industry to "treat"...

Our point is to prove our prior contentions that the hypocritical FDA -- nor any other sinister corp/gov agency -- is not looking out for your well being, and conversely they are looking out for the corrupt politicians that control them, which are looking out for themselves by accepting bribes, deceptively referred to as "campaign contributions", from the profiteering mainstream sick care industry. Burn this into your mindset, inform everyone, do something...

FDA suppressed scan safety fears

FDA rhymes with look the other way

We have observed reports that with the down economy that Big Food, and even all the way down to "little food" like your local restaurant and grocery, has been substituting and diluting expensive food products with cheap food products, being something other than what they label it as. Personally, we think that this has been going on, with the FDA's knowledge, for quite some time.

At any rate, many observations express that the FDA is "looking the other way". Personally, we think that "looking the other way" is a required trait by anyone within the FDA.

Our point is that not only is the FDA crooked and doesn't a rat's rear end, but that you should consider what might be in processed foods and maybe you should start thinking of procuring and cooking real food that will not be contaminated with contaminants and who knows what else...

FDA Urged to Take On Food Fraud

Moronic Oxymorons and Boneheaded WHO Roto-Reuters

The roto-reuters are at it again. Did big pharma buy the Reuters news dis-service?

Reuters recently featured an article that indicated that "A group of independent [sic] experts [sic] will review how the H1N1 pandemic has been handled to ensure that the next global health emergency is dealt with better, a top World Health Organization official said".

So they supposedly need "experts" (aka, "hired charlatan shills") to figure out that the clearly fraudulent H1N1 scam, aka "the biggest diabolical hoax ever perpetrated upon the public", was dreamed up, concocted, trumped up, overblown, bogus, phony, fabricated, ridiculous, ludicrous lies??? The whole world (excluding vaccine charlatans) is screaming bloody murder about the stupidest fiasco that the pharma-supported, politician-controlled health agencies have ever come up with. But, this so-called "independent expert review" [sic] already has the look of equivalent audacity.

If these shill ex-spurts come up with anything other than a bunch of audacious lies defending the WHO-BEE-BOOBYS with their profiteering H1N1 fear mongering panic it would be shocking.

Directly in this same roto-root-hog article, they even mentioned the fact that the WHO-Boos were reported to be involved in "conflicts of interest" with health officials, experts, and vaccine makers but they did not point out the correlation with the fact that the WHO-Buggers are doing what they do best in hand picking their own "experts" within their own rank ranks.

What these "spurts" are actually going to do is spend a lot of taxpayer money to have a vacation getaway party where they will get ripped in an attempt to mindlessly concoct some obfuscatory phrases that will attempt to cover up the fact that they were all a bunch of marketing front crooks for the vaccine industry criminals in fraudulently claiming a "pandemic" [sick!].

How can they have the audacity to infer that these supposed "experts" will be "independent" when they are hand-picked by WHO from a cesspool of public health officials?

Note that the final report of these oxylying morons will not be revealed for over a year from now, by which time they will probably forget about it, in the interim they emit a little brain-dump in an attempt to concoct a smokescreen mirage of their totally inept un-credibility. This is just another diversionary coverup.

Remember this next year when the WHO-Liars and their shill news services finally let their "review" float to the surface of their disgustingly smelly cesspool and call it beautiful fragrant stuff...

Did anybody check with Bill Gates about this as to the eugenic effect on global warming?

"An alliance that provides vaccines for poor children and claims to have prevented 5.4 million deaths, asked donors Friday for 4.3 billion dollars to save another 4.2 million lives by 2015."

We had to wonder, did anyone consider that the above calculates out to over $1000 per "saved" child? Either each child gets about a hundred injections or a hell of a lot more children get less injections and are NOT "saved"...

Or, the "administrative" costs of the alliance must be exorbitant. We also wonder, who actually checks up on the alliance to determine if anything real ever develops with the money out there in the jungles of Africa, or do they just pocket most of it... What? You never heard of corrupt charities? Just google it (results in almost four million hits).

Oh, wait, maybe they are going to spend most of that money to mitigate the increased global warming that will result from an extra 4.2 million impoverished Africans, dying of starvation, but exponentially increasing the population of future generations before they croak, causing even more global warming and suffering and starvation...

in reference to:

Vaccines alliance asks donors for $4.3 billion

Osteoporosis Osteopoohpooh

Rueters (sounds like "rooters, as in roto-rooters where they drill poop outta sewers) news dis-service must now be on the take of big pharma creeps as we have noticed their nosedive into the charlatan shill cesspool.

Anyway, they put out a sleazy drug company article where they feebly, flimsily, falsely tried the old ploy of attempting to deny the truth simply by telling a blatant bald faced lie of deception, misdirection, and misinformation -- standard for drugee shills...

This piece of rooter poop suggested that contrary to what numerous previous scientific studies had proven, that their osteoporosis drugs do not [sic] increase the risk of hip fractures.

Studies have shown that women taking the osteoporosis drugs, supposedly to prevent broken bones, had surfaced with "atypical" fractures of their thighbones, which had snapped and sometimes splintered without any "trauma", such as a fall, before their bones just simply magically broke on their own.

They went on to blurbicate that the drugs were "widely considered safe" -- "widely"? And, "sometimes the fractures occurred in people taking other medications as well as the osteoporosis drugs". Oh, so those OTHER drugs were at fault?

Then too, they came up with this obfuscation which makes no sense: "The experience with bisphosphonates highlights the importance of postmarketing surveillance studies to detect the emergence of rare side effects of drugs that are widely used for very common chronic diseases". Uh-huh, yeh, riiiight...

The shills then went on to suggest that doctors should not rush to judgment and stop prescribing the drugs. Suuuure, just keep takin those expensive drugs that actually cause the problem they are supposed to fix and they will obtusely try to confuscate it away...

"'No causal link has been established', agreed Dr. Kenneth Egol, a professor and vice chairman of orthopedic surgery at the New York University Hospital for Joint Diseases". OK, does anyone have any experience with orthopedic surgeons? We do, and they typically are a bunch of charlatan MAINSTREAM drug-pushing jerks, proven over and over again, by many others than us...

"'We are going to look more closely at the biology of this', Egol told HealthDay News (which is a totally bogus shill of pharma). Is there anything that could potentially account for rare and unusual fractures? If we can find a reason why bones behave [in a way] that could explain fractures, that would go a long way to explain whether this is real or not". Umm, WHAT? or WTF?

The shill charlatan study was funded by bisphosphonate makers Novartis and Merck, grreeaatt people they are, profiteers of the drug cartels. Can we all say "obvious conflict of interest"?

They feebly concluded with: "Several authors reported ties to various pharmaceutical companies". They DARED say that? Can you say "flagrantly obvious conflict of interest" or "demonically, sinisterly, corrupt"?

We hope you get the point. Which is that there is so much misleading disinformation out there in the disgusting media cesspool, so be wary, the sinister unconscionable profiteering charlatans are trying to obfuscate a smokescreen mirage of deceit to brainwash the masses into eugenically committing pharma-cide (death by pharmaceuticals) and vaxicide (death by vaccine) and physicide (death by doctor) and of course hospicide...